Economic News

60%-80% of Retail Traders Lost Money with Forex CFDs — Illegal in the US but Not the EU, UK, Australia & Other Countries

US pepperstone screenshot UK

With these highly leveraged derivative contracts, even more retail traders lost money during the Pandemic than before. Stuck-at-home, trading more?

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET:

This type of highly leveraged forex trading is illegal in the US, but it’s perfectly legal in the UK, in the EU, in South Africa, and other jurisdictions. They’re called “Contracts for Difference,” or CFDs, and they’re designed for retail traders. The hope is that you make a lot of money quickly with little investment. The risks are huge. In theory, you could lose a lot more than your account value.

And most traders lose money. By “most” I mean between 60% and 80%, depending on the brokerage they’re trading with. We’ll get to the list of brokers in a moment. This is an astounding data set that gives fascinating insights into just how many retail traders who engage in highly leveraged foreign-exchange trades lose money.

What are CFDs and how are they different from futures?

A CFD (Contract for Difference) is a contract between the trader and the broker. The security, traded on online platforms, is calculated by the price change of the underlying asset – in our case, a currency pair – between trade entry and trade exit.

Unlike futures contracts, there is no expiration date and no time decay. A CFD trader never owns the underlying asset.

Forex CFDs are mostly unregulated. But there are some rules. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) limits leverage to 30:1 for major currency pairs and to 20:1 for non-major currency pairs. In South Africa, leverage can be much higher, and just to pick on one broker, FXTM offers up to 2,000:1 leverage, which seems nuts to a mere mortal like me.

Warren Buffett infamously said, “My partner Charlie says there is only three ways a smart person can go broke: liquor, ladies and leverage,” referring to Charlie Munger. “Now the truth is, the first two he just added because they started with L. It’s leverage.”

In other words, a CFD is a highly leveraged derivative contract designed for retail traders, where trading does not involve an exchange. Instead, the trading takes place over the counter between the trader and the broker or a market maker.

In the US, trading CFDs is illegal under CFTC and SEC rules, given that they’re a derivative product that is traded over the counter, and that they’re highly leveraged and come with high risks of large losses.

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) requires that brokers disclose on their homepage in the UK what percentage of their accounts lose money trading CFDs. And this is where the data of these money-losing traders comes in.

A guy whose firm ranks brokers started manually collecting these rates every month from the 36 brokers in the UK that offer CFD trading. He calls the data series, “Traders that Lose Money.” And he sent me this data in a spreadsheet.

“Nobody else records this data each month,” he told me. He is Justin Grossbard, CEO of Compare Forex Brokers. He also pointed out a peculiarity of brokers’ disclosures on their websites.

While all brokers in the UK have to disclose every month the percentage of money-losing CFD retail accounts on their UK-homepages, they don’t have to disclose it on their homepages they show in other countries, such as what you get in the US or Australia.

For example, here is CFD broker Pepperstone, one of the 36 brokers on the list (#30). I just looked up the homepage you get in the UK (the “…-en-gb” at the end of the URL). Sure enough, it says in bold at the top of the page, as required by the FCA, that 78.6% of its retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with Pepperstone:

But when you go to the homepage of Pepperstone that you get by default in the US, namely the Australia version of the homepage, there is no such disclosure. It just urges you to open an account:

So here is the list in alphabetical order of 36 CFD brokers in the UK, the percentage of their client accounts that lost money as reported in pre-Covid February, and in July, and the difference between the two months (right column) in percentage points. And an interesting tidbit: 25 of the 36 brokers reported in July that a larger, and in some cases a much larger, percentage of trading accounts lost money in that reporting month than in their February disclosure. And only five brokers reported fewer money-losing accounts. (data via Grossbard, at Compare Forex Brokers).

Traders that Lose Money

UK Broker Feb. July Point change
1 Activtrades Plc 69.0% 75.7% 6.7
2 Admiral Markets UK Ltd 76.0% 79.0% 3.0
3 ADS Securities London Limited 70.0% 72.0% 2.0
4 AvaTrade 71.0% 71.0% 0.0
5 AxiTrader UK 65.6% 72.6% 7.0
6 City Credit Capital (UK) Ltd 77.0% 76.7% -0.3
7 City Index 71.0% 74.0% 3.0
8 CMC Markets UK plc 70.5% 79.0% 8.5
9 Delta Financial Markets Limited 64.0% 67.0% 3.0
10 Equiti Capital 75.3% 73.1% -2.3
11 eToro (UK) Ltd 62.0% 75.0% 13.0
12 ETX Capital 75.1% 76.0% 0.9
13 UK 69.0% 72.0% 3.0
14 FXCM Ltd 69.7% 73.1% 3.4
15 FXGiants 71.0% 71.6% 0.6
16 FXOpen UK 60.0% 60.0% 0.0
17 FxPro UK Limited 70.3% 75.5% 5.3
18 GKFX 73.0% 81.0% 8.0
19 Hantec Markets 66.0% 65.0% -1.0
20 HYCM Ltd 67.0% 71.0% 4.0
21 ICM Capital Limited 71.3% 78.4% 7.0
22 IG Markets Limited 68.0% 76.0% 8.0
23 Interactive Brokers (UK) Ltd 60.5% 64.0% 3.5
24 InterTrader Limited 78.0% 73.2% -4.8
25 Key To Markets Limited 71.0% 71.0% 0.0
26 LMAX Limited 70.4% 76.0% 5.6
27 London Capital Group (LCG) 76.0% 76.0% 0.0
28 OANDA Europe Limited 73.5% 73.5% 0.0
29 One Financial Markets 68.0% 71.0% 3.0
30 Pepperstone Limited 73.6% 78.6% 5.0
31 Plus500 UK 76.4% 80.5% 4.1
32 Swissquote Ltd 77.0% 79.0% 2.0
33 TeraFX UK 78.0% 76.7% -1.3
34 ThinkMarkets 73.7% 78.9% 5.2
35 Tickmill 73.0% 73.0% 0.0
36 XTB Limited 77.0% 80.0% 3.0

We can only speculate why more traders would lose money during the Pandemic. Perhaps it was triggered by the currency gyrations that have taken place in those months that left them even more often than normal on the wrong side of the trade; or perhaps traders who were stuck at home with nothing else to do were trading constantly, giving more traders more opportunities to lose money, and so they took advantage of those opportunities.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? Using ad blockers – I totally get why – but want to support the site? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


Follow us:
Visited 10 times