WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Boeing Co (BA.N) Chief Executive Dennis Muilenburg was repeatedly hammered by U.S. lawmakers at a hearing on Wednesday over his compensation and key mistakes in the development of the 737 MAX that he newly acknowledged, in the wake of deadly crashes.
Boeing Chief Executive Dennis Muilenburg testifies at a hearing on the grounded 737 MAX in the wake of deadly crashes before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., October 29, 2019. REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger
Enduring hours of scrutiny, Muilenburg said he had not offered to resign, nor submitted his letter of resignation to the board of directors as the grounding of the company’s cash cow jet entered an eight month.
Back-to-back hearings in Washington in the Senate and House, the highest-profile congressional scrutiny of commercial aviation safety in years, heap pressure on a newly rejiggered Boeing senior management team fighting to repair trust with airline customers and passengers shaken by an eight-month safety ban on its 737 MAX.
In the most intense exchange at the hearings so far, Representative Steve Cohen from Tennessee on Wednesday thundered at Muilenburg, “You said you’re accountable. What does accountability mean – are you taking a cut in pay? Are you working for free from now on until you can cure this problem? These people’s relatives are not coming back, they’re gone. Your salary is still on,” he said, gesturing to family members of crash victims attending the hearing.
“Congressman, it’s not about the money for me,” Muilenburg said.
Cohen interrupted: “Are you giving up any money?”
“Congressman, my board conducted a comprehensive review,” Muilenburg said quietly, but clearly shaken.
Cohen thundered: “So you are saying you are not giving up any compensation at all? You are continuing to work and make $30 million dollars a year after the horrific two accidents that caused all of these people’s relatives to go, to disappear, to die?”
“Congressman, again, our board will make those determinations,” Muilenburg said.
“You’re not accountable? You’re saying the board’s accountable?” Cohen said.
“Mr. Congressman, I am accountable sir,” Muilenburg said.
Later, Representative John Garamendi of California ticked off “serious quality issues” on other Boeing flagship aircraft such as the 787 Dreamliner and KC-46 aerial tanker.
“You have a systemic problem in your company,” Garamendi said. “You are pushing profits over quality and safety.”
Boeing has decided not to give its employees bonuses or performance-related pay this year, according to people briefed on the matter.
Boeing’s shares were down nearly 2 percent in afternoon trading.
The company’s development and assumptions around a key flight control system known as MCAS – at the center of twin crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia – also took front and center at the hearing.
Lawmakers released Boeing documents that showed the company had considered adding an MCAS failure alert on the flight control panel to the 737 MAX. Another Boeing document warned that if a pilot failed to respond in more than 10 seconds to the software, activation could lead to a “catastrophic” failure.
Muilenburg acknowledged “we made some mistakes” on the development of MCAS, an anti-stall system that automatically pushed the plane’s nose down in both crashes, leaving pilots fighting for control.
U.S. Representative Peter DeFazio, who heads the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee holding Wednesday’s hearing, blasted Boeing for a “lack of candor” and pressed Muilenburg on why the company had not required data from crucial airflow sensors known as attack sensors when it originally designed the airplane. Muilenburg said the company had repeatedly asked the same question.
Last week, Indonesia investigators found Boeing failed to grasp risks in the design of MCAS.
“The design and certification of the MCAS did not adequately consider the likelihood of loss of control of the aircraft,” the report said.
The 737 MAX, when regulators ultimately clear it to return to service, will have a number of new safeguards. It will take data from the attack sensors and not let MCAS activate more than once before a situation has been resolved.
At one point in the hearing, Representative Rick Larsen of Washington state, where Boeing builds the 737, asked Muilenburg to name three mistakes the company made.
Muilenburg quickly listed Boeing’s failure to disclose for months that it had made optional a cockpit alert flagging disagreement between the airflow sensors. “We got that wrong,” he said.
Muilenburg also said, “clearly, we had some areas to improve” regarding MCAS. And finally he said the company should have been more “efficient and comprehensive” in its communications and documentation “across all of our shareholders.”
But Muilenburg deflected a follow-up question on whether he could name specific individuals who were to blame for these mistakes, noting that larger “teams” were responsible for each of these areas.
DeFazio also asked why Boeing approved MCAS when it was vulnerable to a single point of failure.
DeFazio also questioned why Boeing scrapped initial plans to install an MCAS “annunciator” alert and how pilots could be expected to recover if the system failed, when Boeing failed to disclose details on MCAS system to pilots. He also hammered Boeing’s assumptions on how long it would take pilots to respond to a failure.
“I’ve talked to a lot of pissed off pilots,” DeFazio said.
“We need answers. We need reforms on how commercial aircraft are certified,” and how manufacturers like Boeing “are watched” by regulators, he concluded.
DIRECT APOLOGY TO FAMILIES
Muilenburg began his opening remarks by turning and looking directly at family members of the victims seated closely behind him as he apologized for the 346 lives lost in crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia.
In an earlier statement, DeFazio said the panel was aware of “at least one case where a Boeing manager implored the then-vice president and general manager of the 737 program to shut down the 737 MAX production line because of safety concerns.” Boeing did not comment Tuesday on the allegation.
Muilenburg told reporters on Wednesday he believes the allegation was in response to concerns about a change in the increase of the production rate. He said Boeing was aware of those concerns and had acknowledged them.
Muilenburg said that he had met with some family members of the victims before the Wednesday’s hearing.
When discussing conversations with family members during the hearing, Muilenburg repeatedly shifted in his chair and slowed his speech. “We talked about our commitment to never letting this happen again. Preventing any future accidents like this. One thing I wanted to convey to the families. These stories, they are always going to be with us. I wish we could change that.”
Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Stephen Coates and Steve Orlofsky
Source: Reuters.com © 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Thomson Reuters or its third party content providers. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. “Reuters” and the Reuters Logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.Follow us: